Skip to main content

Explain Waterfall (Linear Sequential or Life Cycle Model) model in detail. Also state advantages and disadvantages of Waterfall model.

Waterfall Model Overview​

The Waterfall Model is one of the earliest and most straightforward software development lifecycle models. It follows a linear, sequential approach where each phase must be completed before the next phase begins, with no overlap between phases. The model gets its name from the cascading effect, where progress flows steadily downward through the phases like a waterfall.

Phases of the Waterfall Model​

1. Requirements Analysis and Specification​

  • Detailed requirements are gathered from stakeholders
  • All requirements are documented in a Software Requirements Specification (SRS)
  • The SRS must be complete, consistent, and approved before proceeding

2. System Design​

  • The overall system architecture is established
  • Hardware and software requirements are defined
  • High-level design (HLD) and low-level design (LLD) documents are created
  • The complete design must be approved before coding begins

3. Implementation (Coding)​

  • The design is translated into code
  • Individual modules and components are developed
  • Code follows the design specifications exactly
  • Unit testing of individual components may occur at this stage

4. Testing (Verification)​

  • System integration testing is performed
  • Various testing types are conducted (unit, integration, system, acceptance)
  • All defects are identified and fixed
  • Testing verifies that the software meets the specified requirements

5. Deployment​

  • The software is installed in the production environment
  • Users are trained on the system
  • Documentation is finalized and delivered

6. Maintenance​

  • Issues discovered after deployment are fixed
  • Updates and enhancements are made as needed
  • The system is maintained throughout its useful life

Advantages of Waterfall Model​

  1. Simplicity and Ease of Understanding

    • Straightforward structure with clear milestones
    • Easy to explain to customers and team members

  2. Well-Defined Stages with Clear Deliverables

    • Each phase has specific deliverables and review processes
    • Documentation is created at each stage

  3. Disciplined Approach

    • Enforces planning, documentation, and design before implementation
    • Emphasizes requirements definition before development begins

  4. Easy to Manage

    • Schedule and budget can be set with reasonable precision
    • Progress can be measured against concrete deliverables

  5. Works Well for Smaller Projects

    • When requirements are clear and fixed
    • When technology is well understood

Disadvantages of Waterfall Model​

  1. Inflexibility to Changing Requirements

    • Difficult and expensive to go back and make changes once a phase is completed
    • Assumes requirements can be completely specified upfront

  2. No Working Software Until Late in the Lifecycle

    • Users don't see the product until it's nearly complete
    • Feedback comes very late in the development process

  3. High Risk and Uncertainty

    • Problems may not be discovered until system testing
    • Integration issues might emerge late in the process

  4. Poor Model for Complex and Object-Oriented Projects

    • Not suitable for projects with high uncertainty or complexity
    • Difficult to accommodate the iterative nature of object-oriented development

  5. Limited User Involvement

    • Users are heavily involved only at the beginning and end
    • Limited opportunity for user feedback during development

  6. Difficulty in Estimating Time and Cost

    • Hard to estimate time and cost for each phase accurately
    • Problems in one phase can cascade to all subsequent phases

When to Use the Waterfall Model​

The Waterfall model is most appropriate when:

  • Requirements are very well understood and unlikely to change
  • The project is short with clear scope
  • The technology and tools are well known to the development team
  • The project requires stringent documentation and approval at each stage
  • The application domain is stable and not subject to frequent changes

Despite its limitations, the Waterfall model remains relevant for certain types of projects and has influenced many subsequent development methodologies.